PeteAbe, I'm not going to lie. I'm a little disappointed in you. You were kind enough to link to us last Tuesday with the headline "The Many Faces Of Alex Rodriguez". Last night's entry? "The Many Expressions Of Alex Rodriguez" See? Totally different.
Maybe the editors of Metro NY read Pete's blog? (Sorry about the tiny pic, but this is the only one I could find. If you know how to get a better one, email me.)
And also the editors at AM New York?
And.... aww what the fuck?
Sound familiar? Cause my post yesterday was entitled "You Knew What You What You Were Doing".
I know this is just pointless bitching, but it makes me feel better about the fact that we do this for free and beat all of them to the punch. The advantage of writing online is that you don't have to wait to fire up the presses in the morning to get your story out; newspapers can't exactly live blog.
The downside is that although newspaper advertising is seeing it's reach decline by the second, online advertising is already a complete and total black hole. I enjoy the bounty and free spirit of the internets as much as anyone, but at a certain point, someone is going to have to monetize this mofo. But until some genius programmer and a few media companies combine forces and create an amalgamation of Google Reader and iTunes that charges a nominal fee for RSS feeds, this is all just fun and games (with some futile lamenting).
If someone rips off that idea, I demand a cut.
Update 10:00AM: Forgot to check this earlier, but here you go...
Welcome to the party, ESPN. It started last Monday.
haha I saw that shit when I grabbed the paper on my way to work today and the first thing I thought of was your reaction. "I survived a freaking tsunami for THIS?!"
ReplyDeleteHahaha, yeah, I was pretty annoyed (as you can probably tell).
ReplyDeleteI saw the PeteAbe post first (okay), then the Metro and AM (fine but getting pissed), then the Daily News (WHAT THE FUUUUUUCCCCCCK).
I just want to get paid. Can't a mofucka make some loot out in dis bitch? Sheeeeieeiieeit.